<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intrinsic Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/</link>
	<description>...and how they got that way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:02:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Walker</title>
		<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://significantobjects.com/?p=2549#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen that ... In fact, uh, I&#039;m IN it!

But I don&#039;t know if Josh has seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen that &#8230; In fact, uh, I&#8217;m IN it!</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t know if Josh has seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metheothertwin</title>
		<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>metheothertwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://significantobjects.com/?p=2549#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>If you haven&#039;t already, check out the film &#039;Objectified&#039; by Gary Hustwit (Netflix). 
from the film: &quot;Objectified is a feature-length documentary about our complex relationship with manufactured objects and, by extension, the people who design them. It’s a look at the creativity at work behind everything from toothbrushes to tech gadgets. It’s about personal expression, identity, consumerism, and sustainability.&quot;
It focuses on the idea of an object as an object yet also as a piece of art or creative thought. Much like you are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t already, check out the film &#8216;Objectified&#8217; by Gary Hustwit (Netflix).<br />
from the film: &#8220;Objectified is a feature-length documentary about our complex relationship with manufactured objects and, by extension, the people who design them. It’s a look at the creativity at work behind everything from toothbrushes to tech gadgets. It’s about personal expression, identity, consumerism, and sustainability.&#8221;<br />
It focuses on the idea of an object as an object yet also as a piece of art or creative thought. Much like you are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Walker</title>
		<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://significantobjects.com/?p=2549#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>But wait -- why did  you stop collecting vintage meat thermometers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But wait &#8212; why did  you stop collecting vintage meat thermometers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://significantobjects.com/?p=2549#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>I would assume that intrinsic appeal makes a difference. How could it not? People aren&#039;t buying the stories and getting the object as a bonus. They are buying the object and getting to experience the stories as a bonus. I do take exception that a meat thermometer has no appeal, though. I used to collect vintage meat thermometers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would assume that intrinsic appeal makes a difference. How could it not? People aren&#8217;t buying the stories and getting the object as a bonus. They are buying the object and getting to experience the stories as a bonus. I do take exception that a meat thermometer has no appeal, though. I used to collect vintage meat thermometers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Walker</title>
		<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://significantobjects.com/?p=2549#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Certainly our top two sales -- Russian Figure with Doug Dorst story, and Indian Maiden with R.K. Scher story -- fit the bill of having intrinsic appeal of a certain kind. The cute kind, namely. To me the most intrinsically appealing object was the HAWK Ashtray (William Gibson story) followed by Smiling Mug (Ben Greenman) and probably Neck Team Button (Susannah Breslin). Some others, too, but those were all classic &quot;finds.&quot; It&#039;ll be interesting to analyze more thoroughly how much of an impact this had on on sales price, compared against the objects that really had no particular intrinsic appeal -- like the 4 Tile (Toni Schlesinger story, and a top seller), or the Meat Thermometer (Nicholson Baker story) or, uh, almost every single object that I added to our inventory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly our top two sales &#8212; Russian Figure with Doug Dorst story, and Indian Maiden with R.K. Scher story &#8212; fit the bill of having intrinsic appeal of a certain kind. The cute kind, namely. To me the most intrinsically appealing object was the HAWK Ashtray (William Gibson story) followed by Smiling Mug (Ben Greenman) and probably Neck Team Button (Susannah Breslin). Some others, too, but those were all classic &#8220;finds.&#8221; It&#8217;ll be interesting to analyze more thoroughly how much of an impact this had on on sales price, compared against the objects that really had no particular intrinsic appeal &#8212; like the 4 Tile (Toni Schlesinger story, and a top seller), or the Meat Thermometer (Nicholson Baker story) or, uh, almost every single object that I added to our inventory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  significantobjects.com/2009/11/19/intrinsic-appeal/feed/ ) in 0.33554 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:25 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:25 am UTC -->
