<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Average price, week by week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/30/average-price-week-by-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/30/average-price-week-by-week/</link>
	<description>...and how they got that way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Glenn</title>
		<link>http://significantobjects.com/2009/11/30/average-price-week-by-week/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://significantobjects.com/?p=2844#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>The median prices of the first four weeks never rise above $17.82; and the median prices of the final four weeks never drop below $24.50. So there is likely *some* sort of a Duration Factor at work. I don&#039;t think Mimi&#039;s Metal Boot Peak Effect (or our Barefoot Buyer Syndrome) explains much, though, unless somehow they&#039;re the reason that, except for the Week 7 and Week 10 slumps, after Week 4 the median price never again drops below $20.50. But if the MBPE and BBS don&#039;t account for those slumps, I&#039;m not sure we can place much confidence in them. Also, as the Average v. Weekly High chart shows, we did have some uninhibited bidding before Week 4.

I&#039;d like to present some data showing the project&#039;s &lt;em&gt;modal&lt;/em&gt; data, since that will cancel out any distortion we&#039;re getting from a few wildly high sales. But at the same time, I think we ought to move along now to the qualitative part of our analysis. That will be quite tricky (because subjective), but I&#039;m eagerly looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The median prices of the first four weeks never rise above $17.82; and the median prices of the final four weeks never drop below $24.50. So there is likely *some* sort of a Duration Factor at work. I don&#8217;t think Mimi&#8217;s Metal Boot Peak Effect (or our Barefoot Buyer Syndrome) explains much, though, unless somehow they&#8217;re the reason that, except for the Week 7 and Week 10 slumps, after Week 4 the median price never again drops below $20.50. But if the MBPE and BBS don&#8217;t account for those slumps, I&#8217;m not sure we can place much confidence in them. Also, as the Average v. Weekly High chart shows, we did have some uninhibited bidding before Week 4.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to present some data showing the project&#8217;s <em>modal</em> data, since that will cancel out any distortion we&#8217;re getting from a few wildly high sales. But at the same time, I think we ought to move along now to the qualitative part of our analysis. That will be quite tricky (because subjective), but I&#8217;m eagerly looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  significantobjects.com/2009/11/30/average-price-week-by-week/feed/ ) in 0.24362 seconds, on May 22nd, 2012 at 8:56 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2012 at 9:56 am UTC -->
