http://significantobjects.com/2010/02/04/which-exposition-strategy-adds-the-most-value/ ...and how they got that way Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:02:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://significantobjects.com/2010/02/04/which-exposition-strategy-adds-the-most-value/comment-page-1/#comment-3598 Josh Glenn Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:31:04 +0000 http://significantobjects.com/?p=4584#comment-3598 Will do, Mary Jo. Thanks! Will do, Mary Jo. Thanks!

]]> http://significantobjects.com/2010/02/04/which-exposition-strategy-adds-the-most-value/comment-page-1/#comment-3562 Mary Jo Martin Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:38:45 +0000 http://significantobjects.com/?p=4584#comment-3562 Very interesting, Josh. I suspected there might be somoething there, and I really like the way you categorized the stories. Like Mimi, however, I think some more analysis is called for. If you post (or send me) the data including the final sale price and the type of story, we could assign a vlaue for the story type and run some quick correlations and a little analysis of variance. Happy to help you play with this... Very interesting, Josh. I suspected there might be somoething there, and I really like the way you categorized the stories. Like Mimi, however, I think some more analysis is called for. If you post (or send me) the data including the final sale price and the type of story, we could assign a vlaue for the story type and run some quick correlations and a little analysis of variance. Happy to help you play with this…

]]> http://significantobjects.com/2010/02/04/which-exposition-strategy-adds-the-most-value/comment-page-1/#comment-3559 Paula Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:37:57 +0000 http://significantobjects.com/?p=4584#comment-3559 I still say that the rank of Missouri shot glass should be raised a notch or two because, had there not been an oversight on my part, it would have sold for at least $3 more. There is no question that it would have sold for more than $78. I still say that the rank of Missouri shot glass should be raised a notch or two because, had there not been an oversight on my part, it would have sold for at least $3 more. There is no question that it would have sold for more than $78.

]]>