In cleverly devising a way of dealing with the Duration Factor, Josh addressed the potential effect on prices of both increased demand (as more people learned about the project) and dwindling supply (as we ran out of objects). It’s assumed that this Duration Factor caused prices to drift upward over time. But in a comment to [...]
Continue reading...Friday, November 27, 2009
Some of you have speculated that the Significant Object experiment’s duration affected sales prices — that is, you’ve speculated that objects auctioned off in the experiment’s first weeks no doubt sold for less, on average, than did objects auctioned off in its final weeks. (The experiment lasted for 19 weeks.) As word of the project [...]
Continue reading...Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Here’s another way to parse the data from the experimental phase of the Significant Objects project. After the jump, you’ll discover a table that not only lists the 100 objects, the authors of the 100 stories associated with those objects, and the objects’ final auction price. It also lists the week in which each story [...]
Continue reading...Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Well, folks, here it is. A comprehensive rundown of the entire S.O. 100, ranked by final selling price. Thanks to this neat-o plug-in, you can also adjust the chart to see it ranked by the price we paid for each object. We’re scrutinizing for patterns — and anomalies — and welcome your thoughts. Click here to [...]
Continue reading...
Monday, November 30, 2009
1 Comment